QualcommSnapdragon 855 La Unidad de Procesamiento de Gráficos (GPU) tiene una mayor velocidad. Velocidad de reloj del procesador GPU: ¿esto es importante para ti? · The VIP are part of Cadence’s Verification Suite. Cadence also released IP for 56G long-reach SerDes on TSMC’s N7 and N6 process technologies. Many Mentor, a Siemens Business, IC design tools are now certified TSMC’s N5 a » read more.The PCIe 5.0 Design Kits for TSMC's N7, N6 and N5 process technologies are available for licensing and delivery now. AppleA11 vs Snapdragon 855+ Speed test Update ; 주제에 대한 새로운 정보 a11 bionic 성능; a11 bionic 성능주제 안의 멋진 사진을 볼 수 있습니다; A11도 실성능->벤치성능 그대로 다 나오는건 아닙니다. – 시디피 Update New . Batalla PROCESADORES Apple, A14 vs A13 vs A12 vs A11 vs A10 vs A9 🔥 Porque Apple A12 Bionic é melhor que Qualcomm Snapdragon 855? 2.31GB/s mais largura de banda de memória? 34.1GB/s vs 31.79GB/s obter mais detalhes Por que Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 é melhor que Apple A12 Bionic? CPU 1.51x mais rápida? 1 x 2.84GHz & 3 x 2.42GHz & 4 x 1.78GHz vs 2 x 2.5GHz & 4 x 1.6GHz 2 threads de CPU a mais? 8 vs 6 8 More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking. 3. Uses big.LITTLE technology. Apple A12 Bionic. Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus. Using big.LITTLE technology, a chip can switch between two sets of processor cores to maximize performance and battery life. For example, when playing a game the more powerful cores will be used to xsnPZ. Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+ Qualcomm’s latest flagship mobile processor is the first 5G ready mobile chipset. Apart from that, the Snapdragon 855 carries new Kryo CPU cores, a power efficient 7nm fabrication process, and an upgraded X24 LTE modem. We don’t have to wait for long since the new Samsung Galaxy S10 is one of the flagships to house matter how much we try, we can’t help but compare the Snapdragon 855 chipset with Apple A12 Bionic in the iPhones. The slightly older A12 Bionic processor powers most of the 2018 iPhones, including the iPhone XR and the iPhone XS. The A12 Bionic is one of the first mobile processors to be manufactured using the 7nm fabrication process. It delivers a faster graphics performance and an enhanced Neural we’re comparing these two top-tier processors of 2019 at least for now to chart out their similarities as well as dive into the That MatterPropertyApple A12 BionicSnapdragon 855PropertyApple A12 BionicSnapdragon 855Design Process7nm7nmArchitecture64-bit64-bitCPU6-core processor 2x Performance cores + 4x Efficiency cores8 x Kryo 485 CPUs clocked up to GHzGPUApple-designed 4-core GPUAdreno 640CameraApple’s ISPDual 14-bit CV-ISPs, Spectra 380 ISPChargingWireless charging, Normal Charging via USBQualcomm Quick Charge 4+Performance ImprovementsThe A12 Bionic and the Snapdragon 855 processors are based on the 64-bit microarchitecture and manufactured through the 7nm fabrication process. A smaller process node boosts the overall performance and the power efficiency of the chipset. Well, that’s the only similarity between both the A12 Bionic adopts a six-core CPU configuration — two Performance cores and four Efficiency A12 Bionic only brings a relative bump in performance and not too significant one when compared to the A11 Bionic. So you’ll notice that the app launches are a bit faster owing to the smart compute system. Also, A12 Bionic is more power efficient and consumes less the 6-core CPU implementation of the A12, the Snapdragon 855 has 8-core configuration. Qualcomm has opted for a tri-cluster arrangement, instead of the regular two cluster Snapdragon 855 sports eight Kryo 845 cores clustered across a single Prime’ Cortex A76 core clocked at GHz, three Performance’ Cortex-A76 cores clocked at GHz and lastly four Efficiency’ Cortex-A55 cores clocked at GHz. These clusters are designed for high performance, high efficiency, improved task-sharing capacities and low latency addition to that, the Snapdragon 855’s Prime core has a 512KB L2 cache and is coupled with performance core’s 256KB L2 caches and the efficiency core’s 128KB L2 cache. These L2 Caches work together to push the information way quickly and without any interruptions by acting as a bridge between the processor and the the GPU front, the Snapdragon 855 bundles the Adreno 640 GPU which offers a 20 percent boost in gaming graphics and can handle 4K HDR10+ playback. That’s what Qualcomm TestsWell, the benchmark scores may not accurately translate to the real world experience. But at the end of the day, these scores help portray the potential of a chip in numbers. Hence, a peek into the benchmark scores helps gauge the true prowess of a A12 Bionic-Powered iPhone XRAs per the folks at Tom’s Guide, the Snapdragon 855 scored 3,552 single-core points and 11,196 multi-core points on Geekbench 4 benchmark tests. On the other hand, the Apple iPhone XS powered by the A12 Bionic clocked 4,701 single-core and 11,420 multi-core in multi-core on the same benchmark difference is quite slim in multi-core tests but is significant differences in single-core BionicSnapdragon 855PropertyA12 BionicSnapdragon 855Single-core Geekbench 4 Score4,7013,552Multi-core Geekbench 4 Score11,42011,196Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence or AI plays an integral part in the chipsets of 2018-19. When it comes to the Snapdragon 855, it bundles a 4th generation multi-core AI Engine to power the AI-related tasks. It’s worth noting that this engine is a combination of the Hexagon 690 processor, the Kyro CPU, and the Adreno GPU. If we talk numbers, it’s capable of handling up to 7 trillion AI operations per Snapdragon 855’s Hexagon 690 DSP is upgraded to handle more complex AI tasks. And combined with a dedicated tensor accelerator, the DSP gives the chipset a threefold gain in machine learning the many advantages of this AI engine, a few notable ones include scene detection, super resolutions in snapshots, face authentication, dual and single-camera bokeh, and text new chipset also supports AI frameworks like Google’s TensorFlow, Facebook’s Caffe 2, and the Open Neural Network Exchange ONNX.As opposed to Qualcomm’s 4-core AI engine, Apple bundles an 8-core Neural Engine in its A12 Bionic processor. And it can perform a whopping 5 trillion AI operations per from tasks like face detection or making predictions based on your actions, the key task of this processor is resource allocation which we mentioned above. It smartly computes where to run algorithms on the GPU, the processor or in the neural engine. At the same time, it can even direct additional processing power where there are improvements like faster app launches, learning user habits, and real-time machine learning power. Apple claims that it can run Core ML nine times faster, while at the same time using only a small portion of the resources and battery Shutter GameToday, camera tech and AI walk hand-in-hand. That’s because cameras are now tapping into the power of the AI engine for producing images which are rich in details and are crisp as well as shot captured through the iPhone XRIn the case of the A12 Bionic processor, the neural engine helps to analyze shots in real-time and makes the changes accordingly. Plus, the enhanced ISP brings home minute details to photos. Along with that, the Smart HDR brings in quality dynamic the other hand, the Snapdragon 855 features the in-house Spectra 380 Image Signal Processor. Qualcomm claims that it is the world’s first AI-integrated Snapdragon 855-powered Galaxy S10 PlusThis gives the chip a gain when it comes to hardware depth sensing, object segmentation and object classification in real-time. For instance, your phone will be able to easily replace video or photo backgrounds in real time, among other Battle Cry Gets LouderApart from the key differences above, the Snapdragon 855’s main advantage is that it is 5G ready and one of the most noticeable upgrades will be the bump in speed. It also features the Snapdragon X24 LTE that can enable download speed up to 2Gbps and upload speed up to 316 Mbps. Plus, it also features the new Elite gaming mode to improve the overall gaming it comes to the performance, both are almost at par, with the A12 Bionic taking the lead in single core performance. But when it comes to being a future-ready chipset, the 855 fights hard for the top spot. Hopefully, the next generation Apple chipsets will challenge the Snapdragon 855 and bridge the up Intrigued by the new Samsung Exynos 9820 processor in the Galaxy S10 and S10 Plus? Read about the chipset’s features in detail from the link below. VS We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Adreno 640 with the older 6-core Apple A11 Bionic Apple GPU SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5GamingSpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Performs better in floating-point computationsHas a smaller size transistor 7 versus 10 nmAnnounced 1-year and 3-months laterHas 2 more coresShows better up to 31% AnTuTu 9 score – 522K vs 399K19% higher CPU clock speed 2840 vs 2390 MHzBetter instruction set architecture Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 141555 126597 GPU 184296 122199 Memory 62560 65581 UX 131223 84287 Total score 522806 399113 AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores. Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection 21 images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning 48 images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s 21 images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 91% 62% Graphics test 18 FPS 18 FPS Score 3096 3146 Gaming Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games PUBG Mobile 58 FPS [Ultra] - Call of Duty Mobile 56 FPS [Ultra] - Fortnite 28 FPS [Ultra] - Shadowgun Legends 51 FPS [Ultra] - World of Tanks Blitz 59 FPS [Ultra] - Mobile Legends Bang Bang 57 FPS [Ultra] - Device Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro 1080 x 2340 - We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors. Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 855 and A11 Bionic CPU Architecture 1x GHz – Cortex-A76 Kryo 485 Gold3x GHz – Cortex-A76 Kryo 485 Gold4x GHz – Cortex-A55 Kryo 485 Silver 2x GHz – Monsoon4x GHz – Mistral Cores 8 6 Frequency 2840 MHz 2390 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A L1 cache 512 KB 64 KB L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB L3 cache 2 MB - Process 7 nanometers 10 nanometers Transistor count billion billion TDP 6 W 8 W Graphics GPU name Adreno 640 Apple GPU Architecture Adreno 600 - GPU frequency 585 MHz - Execution units 2 3 Shading units 384 - FLOPS 899 Gigaflops 325 Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s Gbit/s Max size 16 GB 4 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Hexagon 690 Apple M10 Storage type UFS NVMe Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2436 x 1125 Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP 1x 32MP, 2x 12MP Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS Video codecs VP8, VP9 Motion JPEG Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity Modem X24 LTE, X50 5G - 4G support LTE Cat. 20 LTE Cat. 12 5G support Yes No Download speed Up to 5000 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps Upload speed Up to 1240 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 6 5 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 855 523 Total votes 836 Related Comparisons Comments Please give your opinion on the comparison of A11 Bionic and Snapdragon 855, or ask any questions Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs Apple A12 BionicQualcomm Snapdragon 855 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Mobile Platform is a high-end smartphone and tablet SoC that Qualcomm announced in December 2018. The SoC integrates a fast Prime Core’ that clocks up to GHz and three further fast ARM Cortex-A76 performance cores, which can reach up to GHz. These are complemented by four power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock up to a maximum of GHz. The higher Prime Core’ clock speed should provide significantly better single core performance than the Snapdragon 845, but we suspect that the Snapdragon 855 will fall short of the Apple A12 Bionic. The new SoC should have up to 45% faster single-core performance and 35% multi-core performance than its predecessor. Qualcomm praises the Snapdragon 855’s ability to maintain its performance when faced with sustained load, beating the Apple A12 Bionic SoC and the HiSilicon Kirin 980. The SoC also integrates the new X24 LTE modem that Qualcomm promises will deliver up to 2 Gbit/s maximum download speed over LTE and up to 316 Mbit/s upload speeds. The Snapdragon 855 can be configured with the company’s new X50 5G modem too. Qualcomm has also improved the integrated Wi-Fi modem, which is Wi-Fi 6-ready, has 8x8 Sounding and supports up to ay Wi-Fi. The Wi-Fi modem can utilise the 60 GHz mmWave band for up to 10 Gbit/s internet speeds. The Hexagon 690 DSP has undergone the most revisions of that which Qualcomm has integrated into the Snapdragon 855. The new DSP incorporates a neural processing unit NPU with dedicated Tensor-cores that can execute up to 7 trillion operations per second in conjunction with the CPU and GPU. In short, the Snapdragon 855 should be three times faster than the Snapdragon 845 and two times faster than the Kirin 980 SoC. The Snapdragon 855 also has a Spectra 380 ISP onboard, which is the world’s first chip to incorporate a Computer Vision Engine CV-ISP that can perform depth calculations in videos at up to 60 FPS. The Snapdragon 855 should deliver real-time portrait modes or be able to detect objects with relatively low power consumption. The built-in memory controller supports up to 16 GB LPDDR4x RAM 4 x 16-bit. Moreover, the Adreno 640 has 50% more compute units ALUs than the Adreno 630, while Qualcomm claims that it should be 20% faster than its predecessor. We currently do not know what clock speeds the Adreno 640 will operate at as Qualcomm did not announce these during the announcement of the Snapdragon 855. Qualcomm will manufacturer the Snapdragon 855 at the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company TSMC using a 7 nm FinFET process. The switch to 7 nm manufacturing should make the SD855 20% more efficient than the SD845. Qualcomm has not officially announced the thermal design power TDP of the SD855, but we suspect that the SoC will reach a maximum of 5 W and will average around W under load. Apple A12 Bionic ► remove from comparisonThe Apple A12 Bionic is a System on a Chip SoC from Apple that is found in the iPhone Xs and Xr. It was announced late 2018 and offers 6 cores divided in 2 performance cores and four power efficiency cores. Compared to the previous A11 Bionic, the A12 should offer a 15% improved CPU performance for the performance cores and a 50% lower power consumption for the efficiency cores both according to Apple. The chip also includes a new GPU that is advertised as 50% faster, the M12 Motion co-processor and a Neural Engine with 8 cores for up to 5 trillion operations per second. With billion transistors, the A12 Bionic is a big chip especially compared to the Snapdragon 835 3 Billion or a Skylake desktop quad-core Soc Billion. Compared to the A11, the A12 integrates 60% more Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 855 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physicsmin 20636 avg 32923 median 31198 26% max 45072 Points min 27400 avg 27548 median 27547 23% max 27717 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Physicsmin 1934 avg 3937 median 4112 52% max 5024 Points min 2723 avg 3064 median 3056 38% max 3347 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Physicsmin 2345 avg 3892 median 58% max 4703 Points min 2880 avg 3129 median 2961 42% max 3493 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 552 avg 713 median 744 32% max 751 Points min 1116 avg 1118 median 48% max 1119 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2164 avg 2622 median 2694 9% max 2856 Points min 2772 avg 2815 median 10% max 2857 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 725 avg 742 median 742 3% max 750 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2441 avg 2616 median 8% max 2852 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 3406 avg 3480 median 3491 36% max 3537 Points min 4750 avg 4779 median 4774 49% max 4824 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 10187 avg 10955 median 12% max 11388 Points min 11244 avg 11418 median 11480 13% max 11598 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 3295 avg 3548 median 3548 51% max 3801 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 10163 avg 10529 median 10529 26% max 10895 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Streammin 1658 avg 1926 median 1926 16% max 2194 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memorymin 3919 avg 4247 median 4247 39% max 4575 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Pointmin 11986 avg 14903 median 29% max 17819 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integermin 5470 avg 6620 median 13% max 7769 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Scoremin 7059 avg 8575 median 22% max 10090 Points Mozilla Kraken - Kraken Total Score *min 1852 avg 2147 median 2114 2% max 2611 ms min 603 avg 627 median 1% max 653 ms Sunspider - Sunspider Total Score *Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Scoremin 17011 avg 23240 median 23937 23% max 25640 Points min 41367 avg 42312 median 40% max 43280 Points WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Scoremin 90 avg median 25% max 129 Points min 155 avg median 37% max 166 Points AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Scoremin 239512 avg 255436 median 255924 87% max 268271 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEMmin 9188 avg 13484 median 13816 42% max 19329 Points min 7312 avg 9998 median 31% max 12409 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UXmin 53266 avg 73247 median 74726 92% max 79058 Points min 59570 avg 65177 median 66701 82% max 67735 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPUmin 67537 avg 152512 median 156467 49% max 191221 Points min 129473 avg 147840 median 151931 47% max 158023 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPUmin 85969 avg 115207 median 118475 73% max 127208 Points min 106600 avg 124761 median 127986 78% max 136472 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Scoremin 217967 avg 354450 median 368232 65% max 398720 Points min 302955 avg 347775 median 358800 63% max 370545 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UXmin 51228 avg 63930 median 64229 54% max 72343 Points min 71574 avg 71607 median 60% max 71639 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEMmin 52596 avg 61638 median 59373 48% max 75544 Points min 45962 avg 56767 median 56767 46% max 67572 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPUmin 158097 avg 167704 median 167146 31% max 175532 Points min 166588 avg 170290 median 170290 31% max 173992 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPUmin 114777 avg 135173 median 139365 50% max 140166 Points min 98561 avg 122385 median 122385 44% max 146209 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Scoremin 376698 avg 428445 median 432658 42% max 451559 Points min 411764 avg 421049 median 421048 41% max 430333 Points Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total ScoreAntutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPUPassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Testsmin 197214 avg 236383 median 246456 32% max 265478 Points min 482773 avg 486852 median 486197 64% max 491585 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Visionmin 5121 avg 6872 median 33% max 12391 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storagemin 5578 avg 11793 median 11067 24% max 18491 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 8342 avg 9710 median 9664 63% max 11440 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Scoremin 10330 avg 12161 median 11890 59% max 14439 Points Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 → 100% n=23Average Benchmarks Apple A12 Bionic → 112% n=23 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average 13. 1445400 checking url part for id 11011 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 10166 +0s ... 0s 2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 135518 +0200 + ... 4 composed specs + ... 5 did output specs +0s ... 6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11011 + ... 7 got single benchmarks 11011 + ... 8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10166 + ... 9 got single benchmarks 10166 + ... 10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 13 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 14 return log + ... Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 Update 2017-09-11 VS We compared the 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus Adreno 640 with the older 6-core Apple A12 Bionic Apple A12 Bionic GPU SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5GamingSpecsComments 1 Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus Performs 85% better in floating-point computationsHas 2 more coresAnnounced 10-months later19% higher CPU clock speed 2960 vs 2490 MHzShows better up to 5% AnTuTu 9 score – 558K vs 531K Pros of Apple A12 Bionic Higher GPU frequency ~67%Better instruction set architecture Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 145705 127267 GPU 205460 196436 Memory 92875 99161 UX 111507 104297 Total score 558102 531765 AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect NanoReview scores. Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection 23 images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s 745 Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 97% 69% Graphics test 14 FPS 31 FPS Score 2364 5218 Gaming Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games PUBG Mobile 39 FPS [Ultra] - Call of Duty Mobile 58 FPS [Ultra] - Fortnite 29 FPS [Medium] - Shadowgun Legends 53 FPS [Ultra] - World of Tanks Blitz 60 FPS [Ultra] - Genshin Impact 39 FPS [Ultra] - Mobile Legends Bang Bang 58 FPS [Ultra] - Device Realme X3 Superzoom 1080 x 2400 - We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors. Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 855 Plus and A12 Bionic CPU Architecture 1x GHz – Cortex-A76 Kryo 485 Gold3x GHz – Cortex-A76 Kryo 485 Gold4x GHz – Cortex-A55 Kryo 485 Silver 2x GHz – Vortex4x GHz – Tempest Cores 8 6 Frequency 2960 MHz 2490 MHz Instruction set L1 cache 512 KB 128 KB L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB L3 cache 2 MB - Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers Transistor count billion billion TDP 6 W 6 W Graphics GPU name Adreno 640 Apple A12 Bionic GPU Architecture Adreno 600 - GPU frequency 675 MHz 1125 MHz Execution units 2 4 Shading units 384 - FLOPS 1037 Gigaflops 560 Gigaflops Vulkan version - OpenCL version - DirectX version 12 - Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s Gbit/s Max size 16 GB 4 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Hexagon 690 Neural Engine Storage type UFS NVMe Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2688 x 1242 Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP 1x 32MP, 2x 12MP Video capture 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS 4K at 60FPS Video codecs VP8, VP9 Motion JPEG Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AAC‑LC, Apple Lossless, HE‑AAC, Linear PCM, AAX и AAX+, HE‑AAC v2, MP3 Connectivity Modem X24 LTE, X50 5G Intel XMM 7560 4G support LTE Cat. 20 LTE Cat. 18 5G support Yes No Download speed Up to 5000 Mbps Up to 1000 Mbps Upload speed Up to 1240 Mbps Up to 350 Mbps Wi-Fi 6 5 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 855 Plus 772 48% Total votes 1610 Related Comparisons Comments Please give your opinion on the comparison of A12 Bionic and Snapdragon 855 Plus, or ask any questions Some TECH Guy 04 March 2021 1656 Yeah, paying +600 usd for a restrictive OS, planned obsolence, no freedom, terrible battery and overpriced device from a scummy company, sounds like a great deal +50 Reply Good one 07 March 2021 1245 You must be one of those people, who only read these spec sheets and don't do any further research. Have you also thought about refurbished phones? I am an Snapdragon 855+ user, but still your statement is quite nothing. +228 Reply Bad one 14 August 2021 1511 Good one, You mean those refurbished phone that either comes at almost original price or those with cracked screen and 30min battery capacity... Specially considering that iphone repairing at their store cost around the amount of an pretty good cheaper midrange phone +6 Reply Yes 25 August 2021 0303 Yes it’s definitely a great deal. With an Iphone, i won’t have to worry about updating or somethings like that. Android? Nah, after 1-2 years released, they will not care about yours device. +5 Reply

a12 bionic vs snapdragon 855